The Performance and Partnerships Exchange (PPE) is a county peer-to-peer exchange focused on improving performance on county-facing C-Stat measures. Its purpose is to create an opportunity for counties to learn from one another and to highlight successful practices that may work in other counties. County Human Services Directors provide input on the focus measure.
Once a measure isselected, the CDHS Performance Management unit works with program staff to identify high-performing counties (typically 2 large, 2 medium, and 2 small) based on quantitative (i.e. C-Stat and Q/A data) and qualitative data (i.e. staff knowledge)
Each PPE culminates in a webinar and lessons learned materials.
To date, the Performance Management unit has completed seven exchanges. Expand the sections below to learn more.
- Adult Protective Services and Child Welfare Timeliness Measures in Smaller Counties
-
In August 2016, County Human Services Directors voted to focus on smaller county performance on a set of six timeliness measures in the Child Welfare and Adult Protective Services programs as a part of the Performance and Partnerships Exchange:
- APS Timeliness of Initial Response to New Reports
- APS Timeliness of Initial Assessments
- APS Timeliness of Investigations
- APS Timeliness of Monthly Contacts
- Child Welfare Timeliness of Initial Response to Abuse/Neglect Assessments
- Child Welfare Timeliness of Assessment Closure
While statewide performance was exceeding or nearing the goal on these measures, the 44 Small counties - aggregated together - were performing between 5-15 percent lower and were not meeting any of the goals.
The CDHS Performance Management Division, Division of Child Welfare, and Aging & Adult Services Division sought to understand how certain counties overcome the challenges that contribute to lower performance in smaller counties. These Divisions met with five high-performing smaller counties-- Elbert County, Huerfano County, Lake County, Montezuma County, and Park County.
What We Learned
- Webinar on Practices from higher-performing counties (Lake, Montezuma, and Huerfano counties presenting)
- Webinar slides
-
Tracking grid (discussed by Huerfano County on the webinar)
-
County Practices Summary -Includes an overview of the practices that the five higher-performing counties used to achieve success in the areas of managing deadlines, expectations and documentation, staffing structure and capacity and organizational culture.
-
Guide for Smaller Counties: Timely Casework for Adult Protective Services and Child Welfare Programs
- Percent of Current Child Support Collected
-
In October 2015, County Human Services Directors voted to focus on the Percent of Current Child Support Collected C-Stat measure as a part of the Performance and Partnerships Exchange. Cumulative state performance for calendar year 2015 was 64.4%, the goal is 66%.
The CDHS Performance Management Division and Child Support Services Division met with six well-performing counties (two large, two medium, and two small) to learn more about their practices in relation to this measure. Several consistent successful practices stood out among these well-performing counties, which are discussed in the webinar and materials below.
What We Learned
- Webinar on Percent of Current Child Support Collected PPE
-
County Practices Summary -Includes an overview of the common standards that stood out among the six well-performing counties: Service-Oriented Approach, Front-End (Establishment) Strategies and Ongoing (Enforcement) Strategies.
-
Individual county practices are available at the links below:
-
Boulder County (large)
Integrated Case Manager Presentation
Screening Sheet for Barriers Program
Early Intervention Worksheet -
Larimer County (large)
Enforcement Case Checklist
Case Closure Checklist -
Morgan County (medium)
Establishment Team Meeting Discussion Regarding Early Intervention and Reasonable MSO
Establishment Placard
Enforcement Placard - Yuma County (small)
-
- Timeliness of Expedited Food Assistance Applications
-
In April 2015, County Human Services Directors voted to focus on the Timeliness of Expedited Food Assistance Applications C-Stat measure as a part of the Performance and Partnerships Exchange. Between July 2014 and June 2015, the State performed at an average of 90.8%, the goal is 95%.
The CDHS Performance Management Division and Food and Energy Assistance Division met with six counties (2 large, 2 medium, and 2 small) to learn more about their practices in relation to this measure. These counties were chosen based on their strong performance relative to other counties of their size. Several consistent successful practices stood out among these well-performing counties in the following areas: 1) Timely First Touch, 2) Working Reports, and 3) Data-Driven Evaluation.
What We Learned
- Webinar on Timeliness of Expedited Food Assistance PPE
-
County Practices Summary -Includes an overview of the common standards that stood out among the six well-performing counties: Timely First Touch, Working Reports and Data-Driven Evaluation.
-
Individual county practices are available at the links below:
- Timeliness of New and RRR Adult Financial Applications
-
In August 2014, County Human Services Directors voted to focus on the Timeliness of New Adult Financial Applications and Timeliness of Redetermination (RRR) Adult Financial Applications C-Stat measures as a part of the Performance and Partnerships Exchange. Between October 2013 and September 2014, the State performed at an average of 96 percent for the Timeliness of New Applications and at an average of 77 percent for the Timeliness of RRR Applications. The goal is 95 percent for both measures.
The CDHS Performance Management Division and Employment and Benefits Division (EBD) met with six counties (2 large, 2 medium, and 2 small) to learn more about their practices in relation to these measures. These counties were chosen based on their performance on timeliness (C-Stat data) and accuracy (Quality Assurance Division data).
Common standards stood out among these six well-performing counties in five areas: 1) practice, 2) supervision/expectations, 3) training, 4) quality assurance, and 5) tools to ensure timely and accurate assessments.
What We Learned
- PPE Timeliness of New and RRR Adult Financial Applications Webinar
-
County Practices Summary -Includes a list of the common standards that stood out among the six well-performing counties: 1) practice, 2) supervision/expectations, 3) training, 4) quality assurance, and 5) tools to ensure timely and accurate assessments.
-
Individual county practices and tools are available at the links below:
-
Boulder County (large)
Manual Verification Checklist
Task List
HHS Connection System
Pending Reports
New Worker Training Weekly Check In Spreadsheet
Case Comment Intake &, RRR Template
Aid to the Needy &, Disabled (AND) Interview Cheat Sheet
Old Age Pension (OAP) Interview Cheat Sheet
RRR Case Comments Template
Boulder County Adult Financial Timely Processing Best Practices -
Douglas County (medium)
New Applications Checklist
RRR Applications Checklist -
Elbert County (small)
Application Cover Letter
Adult Financial Review Form -
El Paso County (large)
Mail-in/Drop-off Applications Distributions List
Face to Face Log
Intake Productivity Log
Case Review Form
New Worker Training Weekly Check-In
Case Comments Template
Med-9 Packet
COGNOS Ad Hoc Med-9 Re-Exam Report Directions -
Fremont County (medium)
Client Verification Checklist
Case Cover Sheet
Case Comments Template for New Applications
Case Comments Template for RRR Applications
RRR Calendar
Manual Letter -
Rio Blanco County (small)
Adult Financial Case Review Sheet
Case Comments Review Sheet
-
-
State Resources
Connect with your county\'s EBD Regional Representative
- Timeliness of Initial Response to Abuse/Neglect Assessments
-
In April 2014, County Human Services Directors voted to focus on the Child Welfare Timeliness of Initial Response to Abuse and Neglect (A/N) Assessments C-Stat measure as a part of the Performance and Partnerships Exchange. The State performed at an average of 88.5 percent throughout the past 12 months. The goal is 90 percent.
The CDHS Performance Management Division and Division of Child Welfare met with seven counties to learn more about their practices in relation to this measure. These counties were chosen based on their performance on timeliness (C-Stat data) and quality of the initial response (Administrative Review Division data).
Common standards stood out among these seven well-performing counties in five areas: 1) practice 2) supervision/expectations 3) training 4) data tracking 5) tools to ensure timely and quality assessments.
From this exchange, we created a webinar, a one pager of general common standards, county one pagers of common standards, and tools that you can use in your county. To view these resources, please see the links below.
What We Learned
- Performance & Partnerships Timeliness of Initial Response to A/N Assessments Webinar
-
County Practices -A list of the common standards that stood out among the seven well-performing counties: practice, supervision/expectations, training, data tracking and tools to ensure timely and quality assessments
-
To view the individual county practices and their tools, click on the links below:
-
Broomfield County (medium)
Assessment Checklist
Assessment Supervision Flowchart
Child Protection Team Flowchart
Organizational Culture
Authorization to Release Information (In packet)
Notice of Privacy Practices (In packet)
Plan of Action (In packet)
Referral to Child Find (In packet)
Report of Contact Sheet (In packet)
Safety Assessment Plan and Checklist (In packet)
Safety Assessment Plan (In packet)
Red Team Process Flowchart
Timeliness of Response Flowchart
What is Necessary to Replicate Promising Practices -
Fremont County (medium)
Agency Response Guide
Closure Summary Checklist
Face to Face Timeframe Tracking
Face to Face Tracking
Intake Expectations
Intake Phone
Intake Phone &, Red Team Coverage
RED Team Board
ROC Notes -
Jefferson County (large)
FAR Closing Summary
Assessment Closure Outline
Proposed Jefferson County Red Team Agreements -
Larimer County (large)
Case Assignment Tasks
FAR Caseload Spreadsheet
FAR Case Timelines
HRA and FAR Timelines
HRA Caseload Spreadsheet
Initial Home Visit Outline
List of Things Needed in an Assessment
New Worker Training Plan
Ongoing Caseload Spreadsheet
Safety Plan Check -
Park County (small)
Agency Response Guide (In packet)
Butler Institute Assessment Handout (In packet)
-
- Food Assistance Payment Error Rate (PER)
-
In June 2017, County Human Service Directors voted to focus on the Food Assistance Payment Error Rate (PER) C-Stat Measure as a part of the Performance and Partnerships Exchange. The State performed at an average error rate of 5.9 between December 2016 and July 2017, which is above the goal of less than 3 percent.
The CDHS Performance Management Division and Division of Food and Energy Assistance met with seven counties to learn more about their practices related to this measure. These counties were chosen based on their consistently strong performance in avoiding payment error rates.
A few themes emerged from the best practices currently in use at the seven well-performing counties who participated in this process: 1) pre-authorization activities 2) case file reviews 3) communication & training.
From this exchange, we created a webinar, a one pager of best practices, and tools that you can use in your county. To view these resources, please see the links below.
What We Learned
- Performance & Partnerships Webinar on Achieving a Low Food Assistance Payment Error Rate (Douglas, Mesa,and Rio Grande presenting)
-
County Practices- Discusses the best practice themes that emerged during visits to seven participating counties.
-
To view the individual county practices and their tools, click on the links below:
- Rio Grande County (small)
- Washington County (small)
- Child Abuse Prevention and Treatment Act (CAPTA) Referrals to Early Intervention Who Complete The Eligibility Process
-
In February 2018, County Human Services Directors voted to focus on the Child Abuse Prevention and Treatment Act (CAPTA) referrals to Early Intervention who complete the eligibility process C-Stat measure as a part of the Performance and Partnerships Exchange (PPE). The State performed at an average of 42.6% from July 2017 to June 2018, the goal is 55%.
The Colorado Department of Human Services' Performance Management Division, Division of Child Welfare, and Division of Community & Family Support met with four counties and four Community Centered Boards (CCBs) to learn more about their practices in relation to this measure. These counties and CCBs were chosen based on their high rate of successful completion of mandatory CAPTA referrals to Early Intervention and the subsequent completion of developmental screening for children ages 0-3 for whom there has been a substantiated finding of abuse or neglect.
These meetings identified common trends among well-performing counties in the following areas: 1) successful collaboration with CCB partners, 2) effective communication with parents/legal guardians, 3) training, and 4) timeliness.
From this exchange, we created a one page summary with best practices and known challenges to meeting this measure.
What We Learned
- County Practices-Discusses the best practice themes that emerged during visits to four participating counties and four participating Community Center Boards (CCB): Boulder County, Denver County, La Plata County, Montezuma County, Colorado Bluesky Enterprises Inc. Imagine! Community Connections Inc., and Rocky Mountain Human Services.
To view recommended tools, click on the links below:
- Community Center Board Map- A map of Community Center Boards (CCB) across Colorado
- CAPTA FAQ, resources and training from the Office of Early Childhood
- "Intervening Early: What is Early Intervention and What Role Do You Play In It?"- Powerpoint Presentation from the 2018 Colorado Child Welfare Conference by Lenita Hartman, Program Initiatives Manager, Office of Early Childhood, Division of Community and Family Support
- Adult Protective Services Timeliness of Monthly Contacts
-
In August 2020, the Performance Management team supported a best practices conversation at the County C-Stat Collaborative focused on the Adult Protective Services Timeliness of Monthly Contacts C-Stat measure as a part of the Performance and Partnerships Exchange (PPE). The State performed at an average of 92.8% from October 2019 to September 2020; the goal is 95%.
The Colorado Department of Human Services’ Performance Management Division, with the support of the Division of Aging and Adult Services, met with six counties to learn more about their practices in relation to this measure. These counties were chosen based on their high rate of successful completion of timely monthly contacts for adults identified as needing Adult Protective Services.
These meetings identified common trends among well-performing counties in the following areas: 1) accessing available digital resources and reports regularly, 2) strategically planning time to meet with these adults monthly, 3) effective and appropriate screening practices naturally impact caseload size, and 4) building rapport with clients.
From this exchange, we created a summary with best practices, known challenges, regulations, and training tools to support counties in meeting this measure.
What We Learned
- County Practices - Discusses the best practice themes that emerged during interviews with the six participating counties: Broomfield County, Douglas County, Elbert County, Montezuma County, Pueblo County, and Weld County.
- October 2020 Count C-Stat Collaborative Meeting - a C-Stat meeting for counties and CDHS to discuss C-Stat Performance